Class Table Inheritance and Eager Loading
Consider a typical class table inheritance table structure with items as the base class and dvds and cars as two subclasses. In addition to what is strictly required, items also has an item_type parameter. This denormalization is usually a good idea, I will save the justification for another post so please take it for granted for now.
The easiest way to map this relationship with Rails and ActiveRecord is to use composition, rather than trying to hook into the class loading code. Something akin to:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 |
class Item < ActiveRecord::Base SUBCLASSES = [:dvd, :car] SUBCLASSES.each do |class_name| has_one class_name end def description send(item_type).description end end class Dvd < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :item validates_presence_of :title, :running_time validates_numericality_of :running_time def description title end end class Car < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :item validates_presence_of :make, :registration def description make end end |
A naive way to fetch all the items might look like this:
1 |
Item.all(:include => Item::SUBCLASSES) |
This will issue one initial query, then one for each subclass. (Since Rails 2.1, eager loading is done like this rather than joining.) This is inefficient, since at the point we preload the associations we already know which subclass tables we should be querying. There is no need to query all of them. A better way is to hook into the Rails eager loading ourselves to ensure that only the tables required are loaded:
1 2 3 |
Item.all(opts).tap do |items| preload_associations(items, items.map(&:item_type).uniq) end |
Wrapping that up in a class method on items is neat because we can then use it as a kicker at the end of named scopes or associations – person.items.preloaded, for instance.
Here are some tests demonstrating this:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 |
require 'test/test_helper' class PersonTest < ActiveRecord::TestCase setup do item = Item.create!(:item_type => 'dvd') dvd = Dvd.create!(:item => item, :title => 'Food Inc.') end test 'naive eager load' do items = [] assert_queries(3) { items = Item.all(:include => Item::SUBCLASSES) } assert_equal 1, items.size assert_queries(0) { items.map(&:description) } end test 'smart eager load' do items = [] assert_queries(2) { items = Item.preloaded } assert_equal 1, items.size assert_queries(0) { items.map(&:description) } end end # Monkey patch stolen from activerecord/test/cases/helper.rb ActiveRecord::Base.connection.class.class_eval do IGNORED_SQL = [/^PRAGMA/, /^SELECT currval/, /^SELECT CAST/, /^SELECT @@IDENTITY/, /^SELECT @@ROWCOUNT/, /^SAVEPOINT/, /^ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT/, /^RELEASE SAVEPOINT/, /SHOW FIELDS/] def execute_with_query_record(sql, name = nil, &block) $queries_executed ||= [] $queries_executed << sql unless IGNORED_SQL.any? { |r| sql =~ r } execute_without_query_record(sql, name, &block) end alias_method_chain :execute, :query_record end |
I talk about this sort of thing in my “Your Database Is Your Friend” training sessions. They are happening throughout the US and UK in the coming months. One is likely coming to a city near you. Head on over to www.dbisyourfriend.com for more information and free screencasts
August 15, 2010 at 2:08 AM
I'm confused. Why are you not using ActiveRecord's built in support for Single Table Inheritance?
August 15, 2010 at 8:18 AM
@CodeOfficer There are various ways to map a class hierarchy. A table for the class hierarchy (known as STI), a table per concrete (none - abstract) class and a table per class.
Of course you can use STI here (would actualy make sense since all attributes are shared) - but this blog entry explores the other case - as the title ob the blog entry says.
August 15, 2010 at 7:19 PM
@CodeOfficer: STI isn't always a good option, I've written about it before
As FirstTimer points out, in this trivial case STI would make sense, but I've deliberately used a simple example in order to demonstrate the technique.
August 17, 2010 at 4:03 AM
Hey Xavier,
Thanks for the example! I'm actually trying to implement CTI in a Rails 3 application at the moment and am a bit confused by something.
Using your example to illustrate my situation... I want to have common attributes stored in Item (e.g. name, price) and Car and Dvd would have their own specific attributes (e.g. registration for Car).
If I'm updating the attributes of a Car, how do I easily set the common attributes in the parent table? One way is to hook into a after_save callback, is this the best way to approach this?
August 17, 2010 at 3:42 PM
Ganesh, I'll put together an example for you, I reckon accepts_nested_attributes will be the best solution in your case.
August 17, 2010 at 3:50 PM
Good article. However, I like it best when realistic code is used. If an article is explaining a good way to use Class Table Inheritance, why not use a good example of Class Table Inheritance? Would it really make things that much more complicated?
August 17, 2010 at 4:37 PM
I added some extra attributes to the subclasses to make them different. Also! I said above STI would probably make sense for this example, that's a bit of a cop out. Yes, Car and Dvd both have a non-null string column, but they are still different attributes so don't belong in the same column.
August 18, 2010 at 3:57 PM
I'd be like FUUUUUU if someone did that SUBCLASSES constant in my code. Have you considered real class inheritance and class.inherited on the base class? I'd probably define the action in a module so I could reuse it too.
August 19, 2010 at 6:24 PM
Alan, fair point on the SUBCLASSES constant. Composition was the simplest method to show off this eager loading technique, it doesn't need any extra 'magic' to deal with class loading.
September 03, 2010 at 10:34 AM
This is awesome information on inheritance with good examples. Now I can easily practice this with the help of giving example. I thing I have noticed that you have great knowledge on sql commands even deep knowledge which shows your all basic concepts are clear.
Regards
Malcom
File Recovery Software
http://www.datadoctor.biz